Tuesday, January 23, 2007

Changing The Way We Think About Water

This appeared in the Daily Southtown

January 19, 2007

On Jan. 17, 1900, a group of exhausted workers and nervous commissioners stood on the banks of the Sanitary and Ship Canal and watched as the dam at Lockport was lowered, making the final connection between Lake Michigan and the Des Plaines River and reversing the flow of the Chicago River. In that instant, when lake water began flowing through the canal into the Des Plaines River, Chicago's future as a robust metropolis was assured.

This grand act preserved the integrity of Chicago's drinking water supply -- Lake Michigan -- by sending sewage downstream instead of into the lake, and it protected the city's residents from diseases caused by poor sanitation. Ultimately, the Sanitary District (now called the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District) would build treatment plants throughout Cook County, including the world's largest, at Stickney, and would undertake another massive engineering project -- the Tunnel and Reservoir Plan, known as Deep Tunnel -- to reduce pollution caused by stormwater overflows.

But the diversion of water from Lake Michigan caused by the river's reversal means we take more water from the lake than we put back. We pull a billion gallons a day from Lake Michigan for residential and industrial use -- sometimes more -- and return almost none of it. At the same time, we take the billions of gallons of rainwater that fall each year on Cook County and hustle nearly all of it into our sewers, where it becomes contaminated. We pay to treat it and then send it downstream where it eventually becomes New Orleans' problem.

The Northeastern Illinois Planning Commission predicts the region's overall population will reach more than 10 million people by 2030. More people means a greater demand for our water supply. Those of us who have access to Lake Michigan for our drinking water will come under increasing scrutiny for our water use from those who don't. Are we acting as responsible stewards of this precious resource, or are we wasteful?

The challenge for us is to begin to think about and to talk about stormwater -- all the rain and snow that falls on our region -- as drinking water. The 35 inches that fall on Cook County each year amount to more than 500 billion gallons of fresh, clean water. There are only two places our drinking water comes from: surface water, primarily Lake Michigan, or from the ground. And those sources are replenished by rain.

So the task before us is nothing less than a dramatic change in the way we think about and talk about and manage our freshwater resources. Every time we think about stormwater management, let's think about drinking water management instead. Every time we talk about managing stormwater, let's talk about managing drinking water.

Today we treat rainwater as if it were a misbehaving student: We send it to detention. We send it to detention until we can figure out how to get it away from us permanently.

Let me suggest that there is another path. The sustainable cities of the future will be those that are most successful at changing their own culture, that make the transition from viewing stormwater as a problem to viewing rainwater as a liquid asset to be captured, treasured, saved and not squandered.

Clearly we can have a profound influence on our environment, for good and for ill. Fortunately, the water reclamation district is poised to be a national leader in the area of water resources management, as it so often has been in the past. It is rich with energetic, creative, thoughtful employees and has benefited from sound, smart direction from the board.

I believe we have a chance here, a rare moment in time, when together we can set the course for generations -- toward a sustainable, harmonious, healthy relationship with nearby nature -- or not.

In a very real sense, it is what we do in our lifetimes that will determine whether we have succeeded. We can change the culture. We can act as caring stewards. We can treat and manage water as a priceless liquid asset.

Debra Shore is a commissioner of the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District.

Tuesday, January 16, 2007

MWRD Study Session on TARP Reservoir

MWRD Commissioner Frank Avila, Chairman of the Committee on Engineering has scheduled a Study Session for Tueday, January 23, 2007, at 10:00 AM, in the Board Room, 100 East Erie St., Chicago Il.

The purpose of the Study session is for an update on the progress of the design and construction of the McCook Reservior, agreement with Vulcan Materials Company, funding for the project and meeting affirmative action goals.

These meetings are open to the public.

Thursday, January 11, 2007

Fishing in the Chicago River

Since Robert Cassidy described a “friendless river that decades of abuse and neglect had transformed from a great natural resource into an open sewer,” in Chicago Magazine, the Chicago River has made a remarkable comeback. In 1984, the Illinois Pollution Control Baord eliminated the fecal coliform water quality standard for water bodies classified as secondary contact (the majority of the Chicago River). Before then, MWRD has used chlorine to disinfect effluent as part of the treatment process; it discontinued this practice because of harmful effects on aquatic health. Currently, MWRD does not disinfect wastewater effluent on the Chicago River.

Another of the primary reasons water quality has improved: the requirement that the MWRD operate a pretreatment program for controlling discharges from industrial and commercial facilities. In 1985, the USEPA approved the program, and it was made a component of the district’s discharge permits. This program significantly reduced the amount of toxic metals and other pollutants released into the river.

One indicator of a healthy river ecosystem is species diversity. Since the early 1970s, the MWRD has conducted fish population surveys. The MWRD data shows that as the river’s water quality has improved, the aquatic ecosystem’s biodiversity has rebounded. The number of fish species in the river has increased from 10 in 1974 to 68 in 2005.

The greater Chicago region boasts 111 freshwater fish species–85 native, 16 non-native, and 10 hybrid. Many of these species are now also present in the Chicago River. As the river’s water quality continues to improve, we hope that several once-present species may again become viable. These include the longnose gar, cisco, grass pickerel, and freshwater drum.








Thursday, January 4, 2007

Federal Earmarks for TARP at Risk

Crain's Business is reporting that $17.5 million in additional federal funding for completing TARP is currently on hold as a number of federal earmarks are being cut. $27.5 million in funding is now expected.

If we are serious about cleaning up the river and enjoying the direct economic benefits that clearly outweigh the costs, it is time to have the conversation about finding alternative sources of revenue including local sources.

Wednesday, January 3, 2007

Friends comments on MWRD 2007 budget


At the December 13th Board of Commissioners meeting to approve the 2007 MWRD budget, John Quail from Friends of the Chicago River presented these comments.

To the Board of Commissioners:

My name is John Quail and I am the manager of watershed projects for the Friends of the Chicago River. I would like to thank you for the opportunity to appear today and give testimony on the 2007 Budget.

We have some specific comments on budget items, and then have some general clarifying comments and questions.

  1. Stormwater management: We are very enthusiastic about the potential of this department, and would like to respectfully offer these thoughts.
    1. We would recommend that the assistant public information rep position is filled by someone with communications experience using green infrastructure techniques, and best management practices. It would also be helpful if this person had experience in community outreach and relations, because we believe that the overall success of this program will be dependent on proactive outreach and communications.
    2. We would also like to see a separate line item allocation for research and development within the stormwater management division. We foresee the need for pilot projects that will be developed in the field to solve unique management problems, and as the District has done in so many areas in the past, to push the envelope of the knowledge base of what is possible for the region.
2. Energy: We see some potential areas for long term cost savings.
    1. Given that electricity prices under Illinois’s current form of deregulation are likely to remain volatile for the immediate future, we recommend that the district consider price stability as a significant factor in addition to reliability, and price. An evaluation of stable pricing options would certainly include renewable resources like wind, and cogeneration. An example of this would be the state of the art treatment facilities like the City of Ottawa’s Pickard Centre, which uses digesters to capture methane gas and carbon dioxide from the wastewater treatment process and converts 32 percent of the available energy in the digester gas to electrical energy (electricity) and 48 percent to thermal energy (heat).
    2. Financing of this type of program might be available from the federal clean renewable energy bond program which is going to issue $500 million in 0% bonds in 2007.
3. TARP: McCook Reservoir. With the completion of stage one overburden removal in 2006, is it planned that the stage one portion come online ahead of the completion of stage two as it would help reduce CSO’s.

4. Budget priorities (Master Plans): Maintaining the District’s infrastructure clearly needs to be the highest priority and we understand that the Master plan recommendations of $2.1 billion will absorb the District’s entire available non-referendum debt capacity through its sunset in 2016. It would be helpful to understand the relationship between the proportion of these master plans that are required under current regulation or industry best practices and the portion that is elective, or optional? This is relevant given that because of funding limitations we are still 15+ years away from completing TARP.

Chicago water supply issues

Happy New Year! and a good time to add changing your personal relationship with water to your new year's resolutions. To stimulate your thinking you should read the Winter 2007 issue of Chicago Wilderness magazine. There is the first part of a special report by Jerry Dennis on regional water issues. Water: Demand and Supply

"But is the supply truly limitless? Can we be certain it will remain clean? What of those parts of the region that depend solely on groundwater — are those supplies diminishing, or secure? How much is enough for people and healthy ecosystems"

This is definitely an issue that we will be hearing about in 2007